Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Entertainment Productions, Inc, et al v. Shelby County, et al
as 11-6396
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ENTERTAINMENT PRODUCTIONS, INC., a Tennessee Corporation, dba Christie's Cabaret, PLATINUM ROSE, INC., a Tennessee Corporation, dba Platinum Rose, 777 MEMPHIS, INC., a Tennessee Corporation, dba The Gold Club and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SHELBY COUNTY, a Political Subdivision of the State of Tennessee and CITY OF MEMPHIS, a Tennessee Municipal Corporation
Intervenor - Appellee:
ROBERT E. COOPER, JR., Attorney General
600 Marshall Entertainment Con v. The City of Memphi
as 11-6362
Plaintiff - Appellant:
600 MARSHALL ENTERTAINMENT CONCEPTS, LLC, dba The Spot
Defendant - Appellee:
THE CITY OF MEMPHIS
Intervenor - Appellee:
MEMPHIS MEDICAL CENTER, a Division of the Memphis Bio-Works Foundations
Entertainment Productions, Inc. et al v. Shelby County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2011mc00022
Plaintiff:
Entertainment Productions, Inc. , Platinum Rose, Inc. , 777 Memphis, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Shelby County, Tennessee and The City of Memphis
600 Marshall Entertainment Con v. The City of Memphis, et al
as 08-6133
Petitioner - Appellant:
600 MARSHALL ENTERTAINMENT CONCEPTS, LLC, dba The Spot
Respondent - Appellee:
THE CITY OF MEMPHIS
Respondent:
PERMIT OFFICE OF THE CITY OF MEMPHIS
Intervenor - Appellee:
MEMPHIS MEDICAL CENTER, a Division of the Memphis Bio-Works Foundations
Entertainment Productions, Inc, et al v. Shelby County, et al
as 08-5494
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ENTERTAINMENT PRODUCTIONS, INC., a Tennessee Corporation, dba Christie's Cabaret, PLATINUM ROSE, INC., a Tennessee Corporation, dba Platinum Rose, 777 MEMPHIS, INC., a Tennessee Corporation, dba The Gold Club and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SHELBY COUNTY, a Political Subdivision of the State of Tennessee and CITY OF MEMPHIS, a Tennessee Municipal Corporation
Intervenor - Appellee:
ROBERT E. COOPER, JR., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
