Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Sufian Ali Mohammad Banisaid v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
as 1:2015cv03468
Defendant:
7-Eleven, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sufian Ali Mohammad Banisaid
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
SHEHAIBER v. 7-ELEVEN, INC. et al
as 3:2015cv01633
Plaintiff:
IAN SHEHAIBER
Defendant:
7-ELEVEN, INC. , FAREED SIDDIQUI, ASIF KHALID and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Abrar v. 7-Eleven, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv06315
Defendant:
7-Eleven, Inc. and Javaid Sheikh
Plaintiff:
Bilal Abrar
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Dotel et al v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
as 2:2014cv05867
Defendant:
7-Eleven, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mahmood Akram, Syed Attaullah, Netra Dotel and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
SPAVLIK et al v. 7-ELEVEN, INC.
as 1:2014cv05796
Plaintiff:
JOHN SPAVLIK , DEBORAH KISH and JOHN DOES 1-999
Defendant:
7-ELEVEN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Garcia v. 7-Eleven, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv23241
Plaintiff:
Edwin Garcia
Defendant:
7-Eleven, Inc. , Armando's Service Station, Incorporated, Sarah Brito and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Pinckney et al v. 7-Eleven Inc
as 3:2014cv02337
Plaintiff:
Aaliyah Pinckney , Mari Wilkins and Jeremiah Tinch
Defendant:
7-Eleven Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GHULAM, et al v. 7-ELEVEN, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv02540
Plaintiff:
JILANI GHULAM and JOHN DOES 1-150
Defendant:
7-ELEVEN, INC. , IBRAHIM A. ISSA and ABC-XYZ CORPORATIONS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
MORALES v. 7-ELEVEN, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv01614
Plaintiff:
MARIO MORALES
Defendant:
7-ELEVEN, INC. , SEVEN-ELEVEN JAPAN CO., LTD., IBRAHIM A ISSA and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
MARROQUIN v. 7-ELEVEN, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv01609
Plaintiff:
BELNILDO MARROQUIN
Defendant:
7-ELEVEN, INC. , SEVEN-ELEVEN JAPAN CO., LTD., SEVEN AND I HOLDINGS CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
