Cases 41 - 50 of 5,197
Cumming v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00546
Plaintiff:
Stephen W. Cumming
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Castiglione v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00739
Plaintiff:
Kim Castiglione
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Swan v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00542
Plaintiff:
Tracy Swan
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Petrone v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02919
Plaintiff:
Sarah Petrone
Defendant:
Comm'r of SSA Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Allen v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv00539
Plaintiff:
Leon Allen
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Authors Guild v. OpenAI Inc.
as 24-1007
Plaintiff:
AUTHORS GUILD, DAVID BALDACCI, NICHOLAS A. BASBANES and others
Defendant:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION, OPENAI, INC., OPENAI LP and others
Not Yet Classified:
PAUL TREMBLAY, MICHAEL CHABON, TA-NEHISI COATES and others
Shackleford v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00718
Plaintiff:
Dave Shackleford
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
McBride v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00726
Plaintiff:
Darnell McBride
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Yarusso v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00532
Plaintiff:
Andrew Yarusso
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gunther v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00530
Plaintiff:
David A. Gunther
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
