Real Property Cases filed in Virginia
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
A&A Investment, LLC et al v. Capital One N.A. et al
as 1:2022cv01195
Plaintiff: A&A Investment, LLC, Juan Carlos Aranibar Chinchilla and Rossemary Jeanneth Arnez Villarroel
Defendant: Capital One N.A., Rosen Financial, LLLP, Marvin Calvendra and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 Removal of Claim in Civil Action Related to BK. Case
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 0.04 Acres of Land, Owned by Ronald B. Edwards, Sr., Gloria Martin, Terrance Edwards, Linda White, Ruby Penn, Janis E. Waller, Crystal Diane Edwards, and Penny Edwards Blue
as 7:2022cv00324
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant: 0.04 Acres of Land, Owned by Ronald B. Edwards, Sr., Gloria Martin, Terrance Edwards, Linda White, Ruby Penn, Janis E. Waller, Crystal Diane Edwards, and Penny Edwards Blue
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC. v. 0.12 Acres of Land, Owned by William Emmett Martin and Janice Eaton Martin, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00086
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC.
Defendant: 0.12 Acres of Land, Owned by William Emmett Martin and Janice Eaton Martin, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC, 1.05 Acres of Land, Owned by William Emmett Martin and Janice Eaton Martin, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC and 3.39 Acres of Land, Owned by William Emmett Martin and Janice Eaton Martin, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 0.94 Acres of Land, Owned by Martin G. Morrison and Patricia A. Boyd
as 7:2022cv00317
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant: 0.94 Acres of Land, Owned by Martin G. Morrison and Patricia A. Boyd
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Abbott et al v. Gerber Products Company
as 1:2021cv00789
Plaintiff: rebecca abbott, Erin Abdoo, Sophia Alfaro and others
Defendant: Gerber Products Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. Easements to Construct, Operate, and Maintain a Natural Gas Pipeline Over Tracts of Land in Pittsylvania County, Virginia, Including: et al
as 4:2021cv00002
Defendant: 1.71 Acres of Land, Owned by David Lee Adams and Teressa H. Adams, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC, 2.60 Acres of Land, Owned by Faye L. Lowe and Glenn Anthony Lowe, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC, 5.36 Acres of Land, Owned by Dana H. Sparks, Trustee of the Billie Anne Harmon Living Trust, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 2.93 Acres of Land, Owned by Lois King Waldron and Lois Mabel Waldron Martin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2019cv00150
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant: 2.93 Acres of Land, Owned by Lois King Waldron and Lois Mabel Waldron Martin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. Easements to Construct, Operate, and Maintain a Natural Gas Pipeline Over Tracts of Land in Giles County, Craig County, Montgomery County, Roanoke County, Franklin County, and Pittsylvania County, Vir et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2017cv00492
Defendant: 1.97 Acres of Land, Owned by Keith M. Wilson and Mary K. Wilson, 3.76 Acres of Land, Owned by Catherine Beckner Kingery, 2.05 Acres of Land, Owned by Howard M. Thompson and Christine W. Thompson and others
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Amicus Curiae: Tammy Belinsky and Daniel Breslau
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Scott v. Arents et al
as 1:2016cv01205
Plaintiff: Gail Scott
Defendant: Martin Arents, DHI and Deutsch Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?