Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jones v. Washington State Department of Revenue et al
as 2:2023cv01300
Plaintiff:
Cortez Daundre Jones
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Revenue, Newmark, Martin Selig and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Amazon.com Services LLC v. United States Department of Justice
as 2:2022cv01815
Petitioner:
Amazon.com Services LLC
Respondent:
United States Department of Justice
Intervenor:
U.S. Sec'y of L Martin J. Walsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Prodigy Finance CM2017-1 DAC v. Martins
as 2:2021cv01601
Plaintiff:
Prodigy Finance CM2017-1 DAC
Defendant:
Penha Cristina Braga Martins
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009
Alpha Venture Capital Partners LP et al v. Pourhassan et al
as 3:2020cv05909
Plaintiff:
Gavin Myers, Alpha Venture Capital Partners LP, Law Offices of Kenneth E. Chyten 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan and others
Nominal Defendant:
CytoDyn, Inc. and CytoDyn Inc
Defendant:
Nader Z. Pourhassan and Nader Z Pourhassan
Tutschek v. Schinazi et al
as 2:2019cv01775
Defendant:
Gary Wilcox, Michael Brauser, Barry Honig and others
Nominal Defendant:
Cocrystal Pharma, Inc. and Cocrystal Pharma Inc
Plaintiff:
Martin Tutschek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Church v. Maza et al
as 2:2019cv00080
Nominal Defendant:
Cocrystal Pharma, Inc. and Cocrystal Pharma Inc
Defendant:
Gary Wilcox, Brian Keller, Gerald McGuire and others
Plaintiff:
Susan S Church
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In re: Michael Dean Martin
as 2:2018rd00044
Plaintiff:
Michael Dean Martin
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
United States of America v. Martin et al
as 2:2017mc00088
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michael T. Martin
Garnishee:
MUFG Union Bank, NA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
