Cases 1 - 10 of 1,840
Ackerman v. Rigney et al
as 2:2024cv00935
Plaintiff:
Jin Ackerman
Defendant:
Curtis Rigney, T. Phelps, William Gittere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00920
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00817
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ho v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Edmund Ho
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, William A. Gittere, David C. Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Silsattanak v. The State of Nevada ex rel. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Erik Silsattanak
Defendant:
The State of Nevada ex rel. Nevada Department of Corrections, James Dzurenda, William Gittere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardeley v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Marque Gardeley
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, William A. Gittere, David C. Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00741
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00663
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Kirby v. Stevens et al
as 3:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
John Edward Kirby
Defendant:
Corey Stevens, Washoe County Jail, Joshua Hermstad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PacketFabric, Inc. v. Ward et al
as 2:2024cv00618
Plaintiff:
PacketFabric, Inc.
Defendant:
David Ward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
