Cases 1 - 10 of 170
FLORES v. PUGH et al
as 3:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM FLORES
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHAD PUGH, AUSTIN LEE ALLIGOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Proctor v. Rycke et al
as 3:2023cv01463
Plaintiff:
Kenya Laron Proctor
Defendant:
D.E. Rycke, RMI Annea, Officer Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bello-Flores v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Orange County)
as 6:2023cv02370
Petitioner:
Angel Bello-Flores
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKinnon v. Flores (Holmes)
as 3:2023cv01196
Petitioner:
Robert McKinnon, III
Respondent:
Robert Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKinnon v. Flores (Holmes)
as 5:2023cv00629
Petitioner:
Robert McKinnon, III
Respondent:
Robert Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MORRISON v. RIVERA et al
as 5:2023cv00352
Plaintiff:
BARRINGTON GLEN MORRISON
Defendant:
OFFICER JOSE RIVERA and LIEUTENANT LILLIAN FLORES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIVERA FLORES v. WARDEN
as 5:2023cv00227
Petitioner:
Nixon Rivera Flores
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rivera Flores v. Warden FCI Marianna, FL
as 1:2023cv23220
Plaintiff:
Nixon Rivera Flores
Defendant:
Warden FCI Marianna, FL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MOBLEY v. FLORES
as 6:2023cv01525
Petitioner:
Richard J Mobley
Respondent:
R Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Downs v. Flores et al
as 1:2023cv22966
Plaintiff:
Earl J. Downs
Defendant:
FNU Flores, FNU Sanquoa, FNU Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
