Cases 31 - 40 of 749
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv06539
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv06826
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Flores v. Gorman & Company et al
as 1:2023cv01023
Plaintiff:
Valerie L. Flores
Defendant:
Gorman & Company, Caredinal Investments/Redbird Investments and Patrick Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flores v. Meigs et al
as 1:2023cv00979
Defendant:
Rickie P. Williams, Amanda Meigs and Rickie Matthews
Plaintiff:
Valerie L. Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flores v. SSM Health et al
as 1:2023cv00980
Plaintiff:
Valerie L. Flores
Defendant:
SSM Health, St. Mary's Hospital, Winnebago Mental Health Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bea-Flores et al v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc
as 1:2023cv07073
Plaintiff:
Jena Bea-Flores, S.F. and Jena Blea-Flores As Guardian, On Behalf of Plaintiff Child S.F.
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
Galan Flores et al v. Star Food Mart And Deli Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv06472
Plaintiff:
Jose Felix Galan Flores and Zacarias Atenco Osorio
Defendant:
Star Food Mart And Deli Corp. doing business as Star Food Mart & Deli, Nur Grocery Two Inc. doing business as Nur Grocery Two Deli & Grill, Manjur Morshed and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Flores et al v. Pizza Pete's LLC et al
as 1:2023cv06431
Plaintiff:
Aurelio Marcelo Flores
Defendant:
Pizza Pete's LLC doing business as Pizza Pete's and Frank Libretta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Schirano et al v. Milberg Coleman Bryson Phillips Grossman, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv05435
Plaintiff:
Michael Schirano and Gadi Flores
Defendant:
Milberg Coleman Bryson Phillips Grossman, LLC, Milberg Coleman Bryson Phillips Grossman, PLLC and Douglas H. Sanders Law Group, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Gismundi et al v. City of New York
as 1:2023cv06145
Plaintiff:
Vincent P. Gismundi, Darryl E. Scott, Alexander Alfaro and others
Defendant:
City of New York
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 207 fl FLSA: Maximum Hours
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
