Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Flores v. Attorney General of United States et al
as 6:2013cv01137
Plaintiff:
Eric Flores
Defendant:
Attorney General of United States, Health and Human Services, United States Department of and Sierra Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Flores v. Ben E. Keith Company et al
as 6:2012cv01145
Plaintiff:
Nelda E. Flores
Defendant:
Ben E. Keith Company and Hartford Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv01355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Garza et al
as 6:2011cv01203
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Alfredo Garza, Lucia Gutierrez, Marta Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Daratt et al v. Sherwin-Williams Company, The
as 6:2011cv01068
Plaintiff:
Preston Daratt and Melissa Flores
Defendant:
Sherwin-Williams Company, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chavez-Flores v. USA
as 2:2011cv02129
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Armando Chavez-Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Flores-Gaytan et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2010cv02538
Plaintiff:
Magdalena Flores-Gaytan and Maria Isabel Romo
Defendant:
3M Company , Sherwin-Williams Company, The , CSD, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Flores v. USA
as 2:2009cv02359
Respondent:
USA and USA
Petitioner:
Martha I. Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gaytan v. Mukasey et al
as 2:2007cv02563
Plaintiff:
Daniel Flores Gaytan
Defendant:
Michael B. Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, Emilio Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Flores-Romero v. Doe et al
as 5:2007cv03269
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Flores-Romero
Defendant:
John Doe, I, John Doe, II and (fnu) Star
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
