Cases 1 - 10 of 36
FERMAN v. FLORES et al
as 2:2023cv16017
Plaintiff:
EVIN FERMAN
Defendant:
DAVID FLORES, DOCTOR, BECKY SCOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AMADOR-FLORES v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv04218
Petitioner:
JAVIER AMADOR-FLORES
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
APODACA v. KNIGHT
as 1:2023cv03610
Petitioner:
AGUSTIN FLORES APODACA
Respondent:
WARDEN STEVIE M. KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HALL v. HICKS et al
as 1:2023cv01752
Plaintiff:
SIVAJI HALL
Defendant:
MARCUS O. HICKS, BRUCE DAVIS, JAMES STIGLIANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLORES v. KODGER
as 1:2022cv03750
Petitioner:
RAMON FLORES
Respondent:
DR. K. KODGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FLORES v. HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER
as 2:2022cv01601
Plaintiff:
CARLOS FLORES
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLORES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv01010
Petitioner:
CRUZ FLORES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
FLORES v. CAMDEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2021cv09120
Defendant:
DIRECTOR DAVID S OWENS, CORRECTIONS OFFICER BAILEY, SERGEANT TIFFANY DEANGELIS and others
Plaintiff:
CARMEN FLORES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLORES v. TSOUKARIS et al
as 2:2019cv14097
Petitioner:
FRANCISCA FLORES FLORES
Respondent:
U.S. IMMIGRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, CUSTOMS AND ENFORCEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ANSARI v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv13576
Defendant:
FELIPE MARTINEZ, IAN CONNORS, V. FLORES and others
Plaintiff:
AZIZI ANSARI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
