Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Gonzalez v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection
as 3:2021cv01558
Plaintiff:
Andres Rodriguez Gonzalez
Defendant:
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355
USA v. Approx. $879,643.00 in U.S. Currency et al
as 2:2021mc00097
Claimant:
Jose Luis Mendoza Castillo and Maria Gonzalez Sanchez
Defendant:
Approximately $879,643.00 in U.S. Currency and Assorted Money Orders valued at $6,000.00 in U.S. Currency
Plaintiff:
United States of America
United States of America v. Real Property Located in Beverly Hills, California
as 2:2020cv06318
Defendant:
Real Property Located in Beverly Hills, California
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Beverly Hills Real Estate Holdings, LLC, Khaled J. Al Sabah, County of Los Angeles and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. Approximately $380,050.00 in U.S. Currency et al
as 2:2019mc00115
Defendant:
Approximately $6,110.13 seized from Wells Fargo Bank, Approximately $2,082.97 seized from Travis Credit Union, Approximately $80,000.00 in U.S. Currency and others
Claimant:
Cuc Thi Schaeffer, Kimberly Santiago Robinson, John Acosta and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Gonzalez
as 1:2013at00233
Plaintiff:
Jesus Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Jesus Gonzalez v. United States Department of Justice
as 1:2013at00224
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice
Plaintiff:
Jesus Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Jesus Gonzalez v. United States Department of Justice
as 1:2013cv00575
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice
Plaintiff:
Jesus Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Han v. Chertoff et al
as 3:2008cv00581
Plaintiff:
Qian Han
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Christina Poulos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
