Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01580
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01451
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Clervrain et al v. Rossiter et al
as 3:2022cv01194
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain, Thomas Fabrice, Max Jean Baptiste and others
Defendant:
Robert F. Rossiter, Jr., Manuel Cidre-Miranda, Francisco Pares-Alicea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01791
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Rodriguez-Cardona v. Questell-Alvarado et al
as 3:2017cv02182
Plaintiff:
Natalie Rodriguez-Cardona
Defendant:
Enrique H. Questell-Alvarado, Damaris Gutierrez-Santiago, Pedro J. Rodriguez-Rosado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz-Rivera v. Department of Correction et al
as 3:2017cv01925
Plaintiff:
Angel M. Diaz-Rivera
Defendant:
Department of Correction, Hector J. Vazquez-Santiesteban, Yaritza Carrasquillo-Aponte and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Martinez-Echevarria v. Zaragoza-Gomez
as 3:2017cv01524
Plaintiff:
Eduardo H. Martinez-Echevarria
Defendant:
Juan Zaragoza-Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
