Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Kaseen v. Deml et al
as 2:2023cv00416
Plaintiff:
King Kaseen
Defendant:
Nicholas Deml, Phil Scott, Jennifer Sprafke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Bond, Schoeneck & King LLC, et al
as 2:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Bond, Schoeneck & King LLC, Kristian Stefanides and Andrea Bartlett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00083
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
King v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 2:2020cv00205
Plaintiff:
Thomas King
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., RWC Landscape Services Management, Inc. and Fabian Earth Moving, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
ENE Evaluator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Gilmond et al
as 5:2019cv00170
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Trudy Gilmond, Kellie King and Olive Gilmond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3001
King v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2018cv00018
Plaintiff:
Frank King, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
King v. Dame et al
as 1:2017cv00005
Plaintiff:
Eric King
Defendant:
Randy Dame, Joseph Thomas and Keith McMahon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2014cv00184
Plaintiff:
Frank King, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Manning v. Pochop et al
as 2:2014cv00149
Plaintiff:
Stephen Manning
Defendant:
Sue Pochop, Simone Bailey, Morgan Pellerin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
