Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00808
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03508
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02872
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MOVVA et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
as 1:2023cv00515
Plaintiff: Sathvik Movva and ORIGIN HUBS, INC.
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, ANTONY J. BLINKEN, JENNIFER LARSON and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00320
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00259
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02969
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
LAW FIRM OF LARJACK, PLLC, et al v. CITIBANK, NA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01592
Plaintiff: LAW FIRM OF LARJACK, PLLC and STEVE LARSON-JACKSON
Defendant: CITIBANK and CITIBANK, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
LARSON v. CONGO et al
as 1:2021cv01384
Defendant: CLIFF CONGO and JOHN DOE
Plaintiff: HARVEY E. LARSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MATHIS v. LARSON
as 1:2021cv00173
Respondent: KIM LARSON
Petitioner: PAUL ANTHONY MATHIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?