Cases 1 - 10 of 588
Altman et al v. Lento Law Firm et al
as 2:2024cv11440
Plaintiff:
Keith Altman and The Law Office of Keith Altman
Defendant:
Lento Law Firm, Joseph D Lento, Lento Law Group, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Storck v. Law Enforcement et al
as 5:2024cv11384
Plaintiff:
David Andrew Storck
Defendant:
Law Enforcement, Detroit Edison Energy Company, Attorneys, Lawyers and Hospitals and others
Serrant v. Perlman et al
as 4:2024cv11353
Plaintiff:
Crystal Serrant
Defendant:
Jeffrey Perlman, Law Offices of Jeffrey Perlman, Akiva E. Goldman and others
The Health Law Partners, P.C. v. Gonzales
as 2:2024cv11332
Plaintiff:
The Health Law Partners, P.C.
Defendant:
Michael Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
The Health Law Partners, P.C. v. Gonzales
as 2:2024cv11331
Plaintiff:
The Health Law Partners, P.C.
Defendant:
Michael Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Key v. University of Detroit Mercy Law School
as 2:2024cv11198
Plaintiff:
Kelly Royce Key
Defendant:
University of Detroit Mercy Law School
Strege v. Nuclear Missile Rosatom et al
as 2:2024cv11156
Plaintiff:
Adam Strege
Defendant:
Nuclear Missile Rosatom, Social Security, 10 Unknown Named Grand Rapids Michigan Social Security Admirative Law Judges Office Worker and others
Florence Rostami Law LLC v. Mitsuiya Industries Co., Ltd.
as 2:2024cv11123
Plaintiff:
Florence Rostami Law LLC
Defendant:
Mitsuiya Industries Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10895
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
