Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Patel et al v. City of Henderson et al
as 2:2024cv01772
Plaintiff:
Balubhai G. Patel, Mayurkumar Patel, OM Hotels, LLC and others
Defendant:
City of Henderson, Ian Massey, James Dwyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Massey v. The State of Nevada et al
as 3:2024cv00385
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of Nevada, Charles Daniels and The State of Nevada
Petitioner:
Jacob Angelo Massey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Massey v. Jackson et al
as 3:2024cv00379
Defendant:
Thomas W. Gregory, Mark B. Jackson, Nathaniel Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Angelo Massey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Massey v. Jackson
as 3:2024cv00316
Defendant:
Mark B. Jackson
Plaintiff:
Jacob Angelo Massey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Massey v. Daniels
as 3:2024cv00354
Defendant:
Charles Daniels
Plaintiff:
Jacob Angelo Massey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Massey v. Coverley
as 3:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
Jacob Angelo Massey
Defendant:
Daniel J. Coverley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00720
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Massey v. Curiel
as 2:2022cv01902
Plaintiff:
David Massey
Defendant:
Pablo Diaz Curiel and Pablo Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Western Mutual Insurance Company v. Diaz et al
as 2:2022cv01254
Plaintiff:
Western Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Jose Diaz, Diego Diaz and Thea Massey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
IN RE: ADMISSION OF GOVENMENT ATTORNEYS
as 3:2017ms00037
In Re:
Jason Blumberg, Antonia G. Darling, Edmund Gee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
