Cases 1 - 9 of 9
COLE et al v. HORACE MANN INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2022cv00368
Plaintiff:
Thomas Cole and Kathleen Cole
Defendant:
HORACE MANN INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Insurance Contract
HORACE MANN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY V. COCKMAN, ET AL.
as 1:2016cv00178
Plaintiff:
HORACE MANN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
ELAINE GLASGOW COCKMAN , RANDI LANE COCKMAN LOCKAMY and SARA E. GOLDEN
Cross_claimant:
SARA E. GOLDEN
Cross_defendant:
ELAINE GLASGOW COCKMAN and RANDI LANE COCKMAN LOCKAMY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Foster v. Isley et al
as 3:2015cv00397
Plaintiff:
David Foster
Defendant:
Sharon Isley, Pailin Wilet and Horace Mann Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Samuel v. Horace Mann Service Corporation
as 5:2012cv00169
Plaintiff:
Vivian C. Samuel
Defendant:
Horace Mann Service Corporation
Objector:
Geico Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CASNER v. HORACE MANN INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2010cv00410
Plaintiff:
LAURA KATHERINE CASNER
Defendant:
HORACE MANN INSURANCE COMPANY and HORACE MANN PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wilson v. Ray, et al
as 5:2008cv00454
Defendant:
Candy B. Ray and Horace Mann Property & Casualty Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Charles F. Wilson
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Wilson v. Horace Mann Property & Casualty Insurance Company
as 5:2008cv00178
Plaintiff:
Charles F. Wilson
Defendant:
Horace Mann Property & Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HELMS v. HORACE MANN INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2007cv00593
Plaintiff:
TONY ANDREW HELMS
Defendant:
HORACE MANN INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Ward v. Horace Mann Insurance Company
as 4:2007cv00076
Plaintiff:
Burmey Paul Ward and Marcella Duncan Ward
Defendant:
Horace Mann Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
