Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Mayfield v. Bryant et al
as 9:2016cv00040
Plaintiff:
Larry M Mayfield
Defendant:
Stephen Bryant, Billy Thompson, Irma Fernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayfield v. Gregory et al
as 9:2016cv00017
Petitioner:
Larry M Mayfield
Defendant:
Garry Gregory, Jennifer Hubbard, Gilbert Rodriguez, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nowden v. Doe et al
as 4:2015cv00745
Plaintiff:
Charles Cleveland Nowden
Defendant:
John Doe, R Rodriguez, O D Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayfield v. Administrative Maintenance Department et al
as 9:2015cv00088
Plaintiff:
Larry M Mayfield
Defendant:
Administrative Maintenance Department, Administrative Segregation Security, UTMB Medical Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayfield v. Administrative Maintenance Department et al
as 6:2015cv00512
Plaintiff:
Larry M Mayfield
Defendant:
Administrative Maintenance Department, Administrative Segregation Security, UTMB Medical Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cordova De Mann v. USA
as 2:2015cv00042
Petitioner:
Herlinda Cordova De Mann
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Burley v. Leal et al
as 2:2014cv00043
Plaintiff:
Erwin Burley
Defendant:
Albert Leal, Jr, William Livingston, D Mercing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mann v. Livingston
as 4:2013cv00464
Petitioner:
Richard Mann, III
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mann v. Thaler
as 5:2013cv00142
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Jesse Rodriguez Mann
Respondent:
Director Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mann v. Harris County
as 4:2012cv02816
Plaintiff:
David Brian Mann
Defendant:
Harris County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
