Cases 71 - 80 of 741
Inspirata, Inc. v. Mann et al
as 8:2022cv02468
Plaintiff:
Inspirata, Inc.
Defendant:
Joshua T Mann and The Methodical Group, LLC
Mann v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04137
Plaintiff:
Ashleigh G. Mann
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MANN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20990
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY JAMES MANN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MANN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20408
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MANN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MANN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20111
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY MANN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Watkins v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2022cv03171
Plaintiff:
Charles Watkins
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, James W. Oxendine, Brenda Joy Bernstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adkins et al. v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC et al
as 9:2022cv81380
Plaintiff:
Donna Adkins, Sandra Allen, April Anderson and others
Defendant:
Glaxosmithkline LLC, Pfizer, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
MANN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv18808
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS GEORGE MANN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MANN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12347
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN SCOTT MANN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gilbert et al v. City of Pine Lake, Georgia et al
as 1:2019cv00495
Plaintiff:
Elisha Gilbert, Jr.
Defendant:
R. Javoyne Hicks, Sarai Y'hudah-Green, Otanya Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
