Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00544
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McCullough v. Bryant et al
as 6:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee McCullough
Defendant:
Chris Bryant, Amanda Honeycutt, Molly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCullough v. Frazier et al
as 5:2023cv00644
Plaintiff:
Perry Adron McCullough
Defendant:
Judith K Frazier, David M OBrien and United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable
McCullough v. Hunter
as 5:2020cv00772
Respondent:
Mike Hunter
Petitioner:
Rodney Charles McCullough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCullough v. Bryant
as 4:2017cv00438
Petitioner:
Rodney Charles McCullough
Respondent:
Jason Bryant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Saenz v. Rod's Production Services, LLC et al
as 5:2016cv00335
Defendant:
Rod's Production Services LLC and Rodney Smith
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Saenz , Steve Nicholson , Stephen A Nutt and others
Counter_claimant:
Rod's Production Services LLC and Rodney Smith
Counter_defendant:
Jeremy Saenz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Sparks et al v. John M Campbell & Co et al
as 5:2015cv00469
Plaintiff:
David Sparks and Leah Babbitt
Defendant:
John M Campbell & Co, JMC Holdings Inc , Collier Holdings Inc and others
Counter_claimant:
Collier Holdings Inc
Counter_defendant:
Leah Babbitt and David Sparks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv00249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
McCullough v. Astrue
as 5:2011cv00235
Plaintiff:
Jennifer McCullough
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00751
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
