Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Mendoza v. Forrest Co. Jail Med.
as 2:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Arnoldo J. Mendoza
Defendant:
Forrest Co. Jail Med.
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephens et al v. Mendoza et al
as 1:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Tammy Stephens and Raymond Wesley Nicholas, Jr.
Defendant:
Juan Mendoza, Jr. and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Mendoza v. Warden, USP Yazoo City
as 3:2022cv00619
Plaintiff:
Elias Mendoza
Defendant:
Warden, USP Yazoo City
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Arar v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 1:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
Diana Ahmed Arar
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Terri Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mendoza v. Warden, FCI Yazoo City Medium
as 3:2021cv00541
Plaintiff:
Elias Mendoza
Defendant:
Warden, FCI Yazoo City Medium
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Benitez-Mendoza v. USA
as 1:2018cv00198
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Ramon Benitez-Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
