Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Bristol v. Peters et al
as 3:2017cv00788
Plaintiff:
John Thomas Bristol
Defendant:
Brad Cain, Jane Doe(s), John Doe(s) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gillis v. Chapman et al
as 6:2017cv00705
Defendant:
Diane Beechinor, Linda Canizales, Chandra E Chapman and others
Plaintiff:
Tracy Gillis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv01829
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 Americans With Disabilities Act
Macdonald v. Critical Thinking Co. et al
as 6:2016cv01665
Defendant:
Michael O. Baker, Critical Thinking Co., Jamie Meyers and others
Plaintiff:
William Craig Macdonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jungwirth v. Marion County et al
as 6:2016cv00399
Plaintiff:
Aaron Jungwirth
Defendant:
Marion County and Mike Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv02280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv02124
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Hernandez v. Marion County Oregon et al
as 3:2015cv01070
Defendant:
Does 1-3, Sergeant Henkil, Shelia Lawerence and others
Plaintiff:
Darlene Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00563
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Peterson et al v. Grant County, et al
as 2:2015cv00216
Defendant:
Jeremy Boyer, Boyd Britton, City of Monument and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Peterson and Roy Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
