Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Hoff v. Joyce et al
as 1:2023cv00153
Plaintiff:
Kevin Hoff
Defendant:
Joseph Joyce, Becky Baumann, Morris Duffy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brickle-Hicks v. Sayler
as 1:2023cv00017
Petitioner:
Morris Jerome Brickle-Hicks
Respondent:
James Sayler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Benter v. North Dakota, State of et al
as 1:2022cv00171
Plaintiff:
Dean Benter
Defendant:
North Dakota, State of, North Dakota Dept. of Corrections, Randy McGoningal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cartwright v. Krabbenhoft et al
as 1:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Walter William Cartwright, III
Defendant:
Dave Krabbenhoft, James Sayler, Renee Morris, RN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
State Auto Mutual Insurance Company v. Morris Industries, Ltd.
as 1:2021cv00155
Plaintiff:
State Auto Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Morris Industries, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alliance Pipeline L.P. v. 3.304 Acres of Land, More or Less, in the NE/4 of Section 18, Township 163 North, Range 84 West, Renville County, North Dakota et al
as 4:2012cv00141
Plaintiff:
Alliance Pipeline L.P.
Defendant:
1.788 Acres of Land, More or Less, in the NW/4 of Section 23, Township 163 North, Range 85 West, Renville County, North Dakota, 4.865 Acres of Land, More or Less, in the SE/4 of Section 22, Township 163 North, Range 85 West, Renville County, North Dakota, 5.538 Acres of Land, More or Less, in the SW/4, Lots 3 and 4, and the S/2NW/4 of Section 4, Township 162 North, Range 86 West, Renville County, North Dakota and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
LRST & Co. v. Tschider et al
as 1:2008cv00017
Plaintiff:
LRST & Co. and LRST & Co.
Defendant:
Morris Tschider and Bank of the West
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
