Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Kent School District v. JUUL Labs Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01235
Plaintiff:
Kent School District
Defendant:
JUUL Labs Inc, Altria Group Inc, Altria Client Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Tulalip Tribes v. JUUL Labs Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00944
Plaintiff:
Tulalip Tribes
Defendant:
JUUL Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Altria Client Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Sahm v. Onslow Bay Financial LLC et al
as 2:2019cv02090
Defendant:
US Bank National Association, Onslow Bay Financial LLC, Merscorp Holding Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Teri K Sahm and Teri Kealoha Sahm
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Morris v. FPI Management Inc
as 2:2019cv00128
Plaintiff:
Brianna Morris
Defendant:
FPI Management Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
In re: Ernest Saadiq Morris
as 2:2018rd00013
Plaintiff:
Ernest Saadiq Morris
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
United States of America v. Britt et al
as 2:2017mc00140
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Billy Morris Britt
Garnishee:
King County Central Payroll Operations
Samuel v. Avista Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv00334
Plaintiff:
Victor Samuel
Defendant:
Avista Corporation, Scott Morris, R John Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Sharpenter v. Avista Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv00336
Plaintiff:
Ted Sharpenter
Defendant:
Avista Corporation, Erik J Anderson, Kristianne Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Jen v. Avista Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv00333
Plaintiff:
Matthias Jen
Defendant:
Avista Corporation , Erik J Anderson , Kristianne Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
