Cases 31 - 40 of 118
ROMERO et al v. GYK DRYWALL, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv04378
Defendant:
DANILO VALLE, CEIBA SERVICES LLC, GYK DRYWALL, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ELMER ROMERO, ALIRIO PEREIRA and KEVIN OCHOA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PEREIRA v. PIZZA PARAMUS, INC et al
as 2:2019cv21128
Plaintiff:
OCTAVIO JORGE PEREIRA
Defendant:
PIZZA PARAMUS, INC, HANI GHOBRIAL, SAMEH GHOBRIAL and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
SESSOMS et al v. PARADE MANAGEMENT LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY et al
as 2:2019cv17060
Defendant:
PARADE MANAGEMENT LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, MAHESH PATEL, BHAVESH PATEL and others
Plaintiff:
TITANIA LYLES, LASHIDA SESSOMS, TRINA PEREIRA and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv09221
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ARENAS v. MALLORCA RESTAURANT, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv01510
Defendant:
MALLORCA RESTAURANT, INC. and ANTONIO PEREIRA
Plaintiff:
MAX M. ARENAS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01404
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00816
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
EAMES v. MARIO'S EXPRESS SERVICE, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv03807
Plaintiff:
EILEEN EAMES
Defendant:
MARIO'S EXPRESS SERVICE, INC. , MARIO PEREIRA , LEE PEREIRA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Pereira et al v. Architectural Polymers, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00554
Plaintiff:
David Pereira and Rodney S. Steward
Defendant:
Architectural Polymers, Inc. and AP Thermoforming LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
LONGACRE v. K OCEAN TRANSPORT LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00417
Plaintiff:
JAMES LONGACRE
Defendant:
K OCEAN TRANSPORT LLC and JAILTON PEREIRA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
