Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Quintero v. Cherokee County Superior Court
as 1:2019cv00293
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Humberto Quintero
Defendant:
Cherokee County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quirino et al v. Saucedo et al
as 2:2017cv00153
Plaintiff:
Christian Murillo Quirino , Ricardo Hernandez Quintero , Osvaldo Ruvacalba Haros and others
Defendant:
Francisco Saucedo and The Pine Straw Man, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Quintero et al v. Smith's Cleaning of South Hall, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00088
Plaintiff:
Jose Quintero and Juan Quintero
Defendant:
Smith's Cleaning of South Hall, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Marceliano v. Samuel et al
as 3:2015cv00100
Plaintiff:
Marceliano Cuellar Quintero
Defendant:
Charles Samuel, Stacey N. Stone and Stacey Giles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Quintero et al
as 1:2015cv03180
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Jose B. Quintero and Gloria D. Quintero
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Mascurro et al v. The Geo Group Inc. et al
as 5:2013cv00079
Plaintiff:
Juan Perez Mascurro, Jose Gutierrez, Guillermo Lopez and others
Defendant:
The Geo Group Inc., Tracy Johns, Jessica M. Shockley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Urguijo Reinaldo v. I.C.E.
as 5:2012cv00106
Petitioner:
Quintero Urguijo Reinaldo
Respondent:
I.C.E.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Quintero-Mendoza v. United States of America
as 1:2011cv00018
Petitioner:
Salvadore Quintero-Mendoza
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hood et al v. ConAgra Foods Inc
as 1:2010cv00017
Plaintiff:
Deborah Meek, Wally Hood, Deborah Meek and others
Defendant:
ConAgra Foods Inc and ConAgra Foods Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
