Cases 1 - 10 of 10
City of Temecula et al v. Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians
as 2:2010cv07378
Real Party In Interest Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., California Gambling Control Commission, Roes and others
Plaintiff:
City of Temecula
Defendant:
Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians
Rincon Band of Luiseno Mission v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 10-56461
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RINCON BAND OF LUISENO MISSION INDIANS OF THE RINCON RESERVATION, AKA Rincon San Luiseno Band of Mission Indians, AKA Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians
Defendant - Appellant:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor of California and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
San Pasqual Band of Mission In v. State of California, et al
as 10-55858
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SAN PASQUAL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS, a federally recognized Indian Tribe
Defendant - Appellant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA GAMBLING CONTROL COMMISSION, an agency of the State of California and ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, as Governor of the State of California
Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission v. State of California, et al
as 10-55713
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PAUMA BAND OF LUISENO MISSION INDIANS OF THE PAUMA & YUIMA RESERVATION, a federally recognized Indian Tribe, AKA Pauma Luiseno Band of Misasion Indians, AKA Pauma Band of Mission Indians
Defendant - Appellant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA GAMBLING CONTROL COMMISSION, an agency of the State of California and ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, as Governor of the State of California
Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pauma & Yuima Reservation v. State of California et al
as 3:2009cv01955
Plaintiff:
Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pauma & Yuima Reservation
Defendant:
State of California, California Gambling Control Commission and Arnold Schwarzenegger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
v. Tuolomne Band of Me-Wuk Indians et al
as 2:2009at01290
Defendant:
Tuolomne Band of Me-Wuk Indians, Tuolomne Band of Me-Wuk Indians, Tuolomne Band of Me-Wuk Indians and others
Plaintiff:
Tuolomne Band of Me-Wuk Indians, Tuolomne Band of Me-Wuk Indians and Tuolomne Band of Me-Wuk Indians
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Tuolumne Band of Me-Wuk Indians v. State of California, et al
as 2:2009cv02263
Defendant:
State of California, California Gambling Control Commission and Arnold Schwarzenegger
Plaintiff:
Tuolumne Band of Me-Wuk Indians, Tuolumne Band of Me-Wuk Indians and Tuolumne Band of Me-Wuk Indians
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Cachil Dehe Band of Wintun Indians of the Colusa Indian Community et al v. State of California et al
as 2:2009at00138
Plaintiff:
Cachil Dehe Band of Wintun Indians of the Colusa Indian Community
Intervenor Plaintiff:
- Picayune Rancheria of the Chukchansi Indians
Defendant:
State of California, State of California, California Gambling Control Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Rincon Band of Luiseno Mission v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 08-55914
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RINCON BAND OF LUISENO MISSION INDIANS OF THE RINCON RESERVATION, AKA Rincon San Luiseno Band of Mission Indians, AKA Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians
Defendant - Appellee:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor of California and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Rincon Band of Luiseno Mission v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 08-55809
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RINCON BAND OF LUISENO MISSION INDIANS OF THE RINCON RESERVATION, AKA Rincon San Luiseno Band of Mission Indians, AKA Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians
Defendant - Appellant:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor of California and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Amicus Curiae:
PICAYUNE RANCHERIA OF CHUKCHANSI INDIANS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
