Cases 41 - 50 of 1,855
Williams v. R & L Carriers Shared Services, L.L.C.
as 0:2023cv03737
Plaintiff:
Jed Williams
Defendant:
R & L Carriers Shared Services, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Jefferson County v. Williams et al
as 4:2023cv01539
Plaintiff:
Jefferson County
Defendant:
M.D. Dannie E. Williams, Delmar Primary Care Associates, LLC, Gurpreet S. Padda and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Dean, Sr. et al v. AII Acquisition LLC et al
as 4:2023cv01467
Defendant:
AII Acquisition LLC, Flowserve Corporation, Genuine Parts Company doing business as National Automotive Parts Association also known as NAPA and others
Plaintiff:
Nile Dean, Sr. and Camellia Dean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Bean et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv03453
Plaintiff:
William Bean and Tina Bean
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cheri Williams v. United States
as 23-3443
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Cheri Williams
Defendant / Appellant:
United States of America
Overka v. Standley et al
as 4:2023cv01338
Counter Defendant:
William Overka
Defendant:
Dennis Standley
Counter Claimant:
Energy Transport Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Williams v. Texas Roadhouse Holdings LLC
as 4:2023cv01196
Plaintiff:
Ester Williams
Defendant:
Texas Roadhouse Holdings LLC doing business as Texas Roadhouse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Bidwell v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02907
Plaintiff:
William Bidwell
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Bowen v. Torax Medical, Inc. et al
as 0:2023cv02879
Plaintiff:
William Bowen
Defendant:
Torax Medical, Inc., Ethicon Inc. and Ethicon, Inc.
Tilsley v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02878
Plaintiff:
William Tilsley
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
