Cases 21 - 30 of 356
Mackey v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01610
Plaintiff:
William Mackey
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Williams v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00674
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc.
Plaintiff:
Celeea Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bartsch v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01550
Plaintiff:
William Bartsch, Jr. and William Walter Bartsch, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Graham v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01546
Plaintiff:
Robert Graham and Robert William Graham
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Smith v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01528
Plaintiff:
William Wayne Smith
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Godwin et al v. Corteva, Inc. et al
as 7:2023cv01500
Plaintiff:
Amy Godwin, William Martin, Tanya Mathews and others
Defendant:
Corteva, Inc., DuPont de Nemours, Inc., EIDP, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
KERR v. ROGERS, et al.
as 1:2023cv00929
Plaintiff:
ADAM GATES KERR
Defendant:
SHERIFF DANNY ROGERS, GUILFORD COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, OFFICER ATIF ABDELRAHMAN GAMAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Williams v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01440
Plaintiff:
Darryl Williams
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Williams v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01349
Plaintiff:
Timothy Williams
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Williams v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01295
Plaintiff:
Eddie Williams
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
