Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Marshall v. English et al
as 5:2020cv03190
Defendant:
W. J. Morris, Earl Leroy Yeakel, III, Craig Watkins and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Marshall, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02486
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02114
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Coffman v. Pratt Community College et al
as 5:2018cv04023
Plaintiff:
Dustin D. Coffman
Defendant:
Pratt Community College, Kay Watkins and Michael Calvert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv09110
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Watkins v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
as 2:2014cv02180
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Watkins
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Watkins v. Federal Communications Commission et al
as 2:2013cv02359
Plaintiff:
Susan V. Watkins
Defendant:
Federal Communications Commission and John Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
D.J. Young Publishing Co., LLC et al v. Unified Government of Wyandotte County and Kansas City, Kansas et al
as 2:2012cv02011
Plaintiff:
D.J. Young Publishing Co., LLC and William C. Young
Defendant:
Unified Government of Wyandotte County and Kansas City, Kansas, Timothy Orrick, Nathaniel Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Watkins et al
as 6:2011cv01192
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Louella Watkins, Bob's Super Saver, Inc., and Parham's Bakery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
