Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Martin v. Tewalt
as 1:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Walter B. Martin
Defendant:
Josh Tewalt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sivak v. Winmill et al
as 1:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Lacey Sivak
Defendant:
B Lynn Winmill, Amanda K. Brailsford and David C. Nye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Owner of Vehicle, et al.
as 1:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Tremayne Johnson
Defendant:
Owner of Vehicle, Nampa Police Officers, Ronald N. Prado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byerly v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2023cv00563
Plaintiff:
Nathan Byerly
Defendant:
State of Idaho, OC Josh Tewalt, Brett Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sivak v. Winmill
as 1:2023cv00360
Plaintiff:
Lacey Mark Sivak
Defendant:
Judge B Lynn Winmill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
B-3-88-A, et al. v. Sileoni 98822
as 1:2023cv00314
Plaintiff:
William B-3-88-A, Linzy, Thompson and others
Defendant:
Sileoni 98822
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stone v. Tewalt
as 1:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
Scott Stone
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Josh Tewalt, Judge B. Lynn Winmill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willard v. Tewalt, et al.
as 1:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
Cody Willard
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Judge B Lynn Winmill, Judge David C. Nye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Padilla v. Tewalt, et al.
as 1:2023cv00184
Plaintiff:
Omar Padilla
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Judge B. Lynn Winmill, Judge David C. Nye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hodges-Foote v. Tewalt
as 1:2023cv00188
Plaintiff:
Kylie Hodges-Foote
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Judge B Lynn Winmill, Judge David C. Nye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
