Cases 1 - 10 of 106
Rivera v. Alves
as 1:2024cv10534
Petitioner:
Miguel A. Rivera
Respondent:
Nelson B. Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perry v. Alves
as 1:2023cv13028
Petitioner:
Frederick Perry
Respondent:
Nelson B Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duarte v. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2023cv12388
Plaintiff:
Eric J. Duarte
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Sheriff Patrick W. McDermott, Superintendent Danielle Frane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chamberlin v. Alves
as 4:2023cv40036
Plaintiff:
Peter Mark Chamberlin
Defendant:
Superintendent Nelson B Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Castro v. Alves
as 1:2023cv10643
Petitioner:
Jonathan Castro
Respondent:
Nelson B Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Reddicks v. Alves
as 1:2023cv10455
Petitioner:
Charles Reddicks
Respondent:
Superintendent Nelson B Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mahoney v. Saris et al
as 1:2023cv10290
Plaintiff:
Edward Mahoney and Brian Mahoney
Defendant:
Judge Patti B. Saris, Clerk Matthew Paine, Claride Geraldino-Karasek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ardaneh v. Commonwealth of Masachusetts et al
as 1:2023cv10148
Plaintiff:
Hamid Reza Ardaneh
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Masachusetts, Kristen Buxton, Ceara Mahoney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ferreira v. Alves
as 1:2022cv11352
Petitioner:
Antonio M. Ferreira
Respondent:
Superintendent Nelson B Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Velasquez v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv11217
Petitioner:
Ariel Omar Velasquez
Respondent:
Merrick B Garland, United States Marshal Service and Daniel Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
