Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Clifton v. Jeffreys
as 8:2024cv00048
Petitioner:
Casey B. Clifton
Respondent:
Rob Jeffreys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dan v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2023cv00532
Plaintiff:
Anthony T. Dan
Defendant:
State of Nebraska, Cherl Finn, Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Batts v. City of Grand Island et al
as 8:2023cv00371
Plaintiff:
Brian Michael Batts
Defendant:
City of Grand Island, Kevin Denney, B. Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. USA
as 4:2023cv03151
Petitioner:
Walter B. Jones, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Dortch v. Jeffreys
as 8:2023cv00262
Petitioner:
Milton B. Dortch, Jr.
Respondent:
Rob Jeffreys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kimbrough v. Hogan et al
as 8:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
Quintan J. Kimbrough
Defendant:
A. Hogan, III, Johathan B. Gorden, Michael J. Meyers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bronson v. Peterson et al
as 8:2022cv00424
Plaintiff:
Clyde Bronson
Defendant:
Doug Peterson, Gary B. Randall, James Mastellar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wiggins v. Omaha Police Dept.
as 8:2022cv00009
Petitioner:
Jerrold B. Wiggins
Respondent:
Omaha Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rosser v. Cheyenne District Court et al
as 8:2021cv00226
Defendant:
Cheyenne District Court, Paul B. Schaub, Derik Weimer and others
Plaintiff:
Robert H. Rosser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cole v. Cotton et al
as 4:2021cv03062
Defendant:
State of Nebraska, Brianna Husmann, Judge Duane Dougherty and others
Plaintiff:
Frankie Levi Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
