Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Dan v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2023cv00532
Plaintiff:
Anthony T. Dan
Defendant:
State of Nebraska, Cherl Finn, Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Batts v. City of Grand Island et al
as 8:2023cv00371
Plaintiff:
Brian Michael Batts
Defendant:
City of Grand Island, Kevin Denney, B. Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. USA
as 4:2021cv03005
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Shawn Thomas Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Brooks v. USA
as 4:2020cv03122
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Shawn Thomas Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lightfeather v. Osborn et al
as 4:2020cv03118
Defendant:
Trevor, Dawn, Malinda, Brenda Mae Stinson, Rusty Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Austin Edward Lightfeather
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. City of Grand Island et al
as 8:2019cv00473
Defendant:
City of Grand Island, Dean Elliott, Justin Roehrich and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duggin et al v. Douglas County, Nebraska et al
as 8:2019cv00406
Defendant:
Wellpath, LLC, Douglas County, Nebraska, Official Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Lorraine Duggin and John (Jack) Kiscoan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Seaman et al
as 4:2017cv03015
Plaintiff:
Clinton Brooks, Jr.
Defendant:
Jane Burkes, Teresa Richard and Benjamin Seaman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Powell et al
as 4:2016cv03122
Plaintiff:
Shawn T. Brooks
Defendant:
Cheryl Flinn, Shaun Luebbe and David Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. State of Nebraska
as 4:2016cv03048
Petitioner:
Clinton Brooks, Jr.
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Respondent:
State of Nebraska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
