Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Cases 1 - 10 of 115
RSS Feed | View as table | Sort by last update
Barnes v. O'Malley
as 5:2023cv00758
Plaintiff: Michael Travis Barnes
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi and Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Barnes v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00641
Plaintiff: Geneva Barnes
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gathright et al v. Boston Scientific Corp. et al
as 2:2017cv03745
Plaintiff: Gladys Gathright , Wilma Berger , Marva Bevis and others
Defendant: Boston Scientific Corporation and Doe Manufacturers 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barnes et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv01022
Plaintiff: Cindy Barnes and Michael Barnes
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barnes v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00867
Plaintiff: Sandra Barnes
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barnes v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv12467
Plaintiff: Sherri Barnes
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barnes et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv09087
Plaintiff: Wanda Barnes and Randy Barnes
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barnes v. Perma-Pipe, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv08636
Plaintiff: Shaquan Barnes
Defendant: Perma-Pipe, Inc. , MFRI, Inc. , Preferred Piping Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barnes v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv08534
Plaintiff: Tamilynne J. Barnes
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barnes v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv08373
Plaintiff: Jimmie Barnes
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?