Cases 1 - 10 of 320
Francisco H. Prado v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
Francisco H. Prado
Defendant:
County of Riverside, Sheriff Chad Blanco, Dennis Vroom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. United States Human Rights Network, et al.
as 24-801
Plaintiff:
ROSALEE GONZALEZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES HUMAN RIGHTS NETWORK, MARCIA JOHNSON-BLANCO, ERIC TARS and others
Gonzalez v. United States Human Rights Network, et al.
as 24-762
Plaintiff:
ROSALEE GONZALEZ, Dr.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES HUMAN RIGHTS NETWORK, MARCIA JOHNSON-BLANCO, ERIC TARS and others
Rodriguez-Blanco v. Garland
as 24-719
Petitioner:
TEODORO RODRIGUEZ-BLANCO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Blanco-Rivera v. Garland
as 24-657
Petitioner:
MARTINIANO BLANCO-RIVERA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Byline Bank v. Gribben and Associates Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00927
Plaintiff:
Byline Bank
Defendant:
Gribben & Associates, Inc., Gribben Holdings, Inc., JNB Transport, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Evanston Insurance Company v. ComAv, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00031
Counter Defendant:
EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY
Counter Claimant:
COMAV, LLC, CVF CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC., THE CENTRAL VALLEY FUND II (AIV) LP and others
Defendant:
AVST, LLC, CRAIG C GARRICK and Craig C. Garrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Adolfo Blanco v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2023cv10772
Plaintiff:
Adolfo Blanco
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Blanco-Hernandez v. Garland
as 23-4337
Petitioner:
JORGE MARIO BLANCO-HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Blanco et al v. Volvo Car USA, LLC
as 3:2023cv06275
Plaintiff:
Jolene Koch Blanco and Lilia Blanco
Defendant:
Volvo Car USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
