Cases 1 - 10 of 94
Francisco H. Prado v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
Francisco H. Prado
Defendant:
County of Riverside, Sheriff Chad Blanco, Dennis Vroom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Hopson v. Kings County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv01555
Plaintiff:
Ryan Joel Hopson
Defendant:
Kings County Jail, A. Lopez, Hanford Sheriff Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruiz v. Lopez et al
as 2:2023cv02262
Plaintiff:
Martin Moreno Ruiz
Defendant:
Luis Felipe Cruz Lopez, Gabriela Oceguera, Hector Salomon Galindo Alvarado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Enrique Diaz v. ODOC, et al
as 23-35441
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ENRIQUE ZACARIAS DIAZ
Defendant / Appellee:
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, M. TESTER and A. BLANCO
Blanco v. State of Nevada
as 3:2023cv00116
Petitioner:
Michell Blanco, Mitchell Blanco and Michel Blanco
Respondent:
State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruiz v. Lopez et al
as 2:2023cv00164
Plaintiff:
Martin Moreno Ruiz
Defendant:
Luis Felipe Cruz Lopez, Gabriela Oceguera, Hector Salomon Galindo Alvarado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norman Blanco v. R. Johnson
as 22-56222
Petitioner / Appellant:
NORMAN PAUL BLANCO
Respondent / Appellee:
R. C. JOHNSON, Warden
Israel Arroniz v. Chad Blanco
as 5:2022cv02029
Plaintiff:
Israel Arroniz
Defendant:
Chad Blanco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Prins et al
as 6:2022cv01712
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Smith
Defendant:
Craig Prins, C/O Drumonet, C/O K. Engles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ricardo Camarillo v. Chad Blanco
as 5:2022cv01670
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Camarillo
Defendant:
Chad Blanco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
