Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Blanco v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02971
Plaintiff:
Myrtle Blanco
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Blanco v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01994
Plaintiff:
Anita Blanco
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Blanco v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03517
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dorine Blanco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blanco v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv00634
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and CR Bard Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Kachina Blanco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blanco v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv00410
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and CR Bard Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Shelia Blanco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
County of Blanco v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019op45237
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Pharmaceutical Research Associates, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
County of Blanco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mennonite General Hospital, Inc. et al v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 1:2019op45109
Defendant:
CESAR CASTILLO, INC., Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Anda, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
MENNONITE GENERAL HOSPITAL, INC., HOSPITAL MENONITA CAGUAS, INC., HOSPITAL MENONITA GUAYAMA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Herrera et al v. SAR Food of Ohio, Inc.
as 1:2015cv01786
Defendant:
SAR Food of Ohio, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Herrera , Jose Blanco , Emilio Cerna and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02027
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 790
Blanco v. Zimmer US, Inc.
as 1:2011cv02755
Plaintiff:
Eileen E. Blanco
Defendant:
Zimmer US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
