Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00486
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Smith v. Prins et al
as 6:2022cv01712
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Smith
Defendant:
Craig Prins, C/O Drumonet, C/O K. Engles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv01048
Plaintiff:
Enrique Zacarias Diaz
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, M. Tester and A. Blanco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elixer Therapeutics LLC v. TNR Holding Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv01560
Plaintiff:
Elixer Therapeutics LLC
Defendant:
TNR Holding Group, Inc., PODS Health, Inc., Warehouse Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Elixir Therapeutics, LLC v. TNR HOLDING GROUP, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv01553
Plaintiff:
Elixir Therapeutics, LLC
Defendant:
TNR HOLDING GROUP, Inc., PODS HEALTH, Inc., WAREHOUSE HOLDINGS, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1965
v. Elixir Therapeutics, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv01554
Defendant:
Elixir Therapeutics, LLC, TNR HOLDING GROUP, Inc., PODS HEALTH, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Karboau v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2011cv06312
Defendant:
Alica Aleson, Trent Axen, Bales and others
Plaintiff:
Milaudi Karboau
Amicu:
Officer Park and Counselor Ragland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanco-Garcia v. Lazy HW, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00326
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Rodolfo Blanco-Garcia
Defendant:
Lazy HW, Inc., Josh Owens, Mackenzie Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00907
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
