Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Boyle v. L-3 Communications Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv02136
Defendant:
L-3 Communications Corporation, National Union Fire Insurance Company, American International Group and others
Plaintiff:
Pauline Boyle
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Westport Insurance Corporation v. Sycamore Community Unit School District #427 et al
as 1:2020cv07081
Defendant:
Sycamore Community Unit School District #427, Dustin Rudy and Dayle Boyle
Plaintiff:
Westport Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Deerfield Construction, Incorp, et al v. Law Offices of Meachum, Stark,, et al
as 18-2224
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DEERFIELD CONSTRUCTION, INCORPORATED and SHAWN GRAFF
Defendant - Appellant:
LAW OFFICES OF MEACHUM, STARK, BOYLE & TRAFMAN and DAVID J. OLMSTEAD
Boyle, Terry v. J.R. Crawford Construction, LLC
as 3:2015cv00655
Plaintiff:
Terry Boyle
Defendant:
J.R. Crawford Construction, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Scott v. Boyle et al
as 2:2012cv00214
Plaintiff:
David E Scott
Defendant:
Gerald P Boyle and Boyle Boyle & Boyle SC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gregory Smith v. Jalate Hunt, et al
as 11-1405
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
JALATE HUNT, Chicago Police Officer, Star No. 13810, J. CORTES, Chicago Police Officer, Star No. 18443, RICHARD DOWLINGS, Chicago Police Officer, Star No. 972 and others
STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY v. J.D., A MINOR, BY HIS PARENT, C.D. et al
as 3:2010cv00040
Defendant:
GEORGE F. BOYLES and J.D., A MINOR, BY HIS PARENT, C.D.
Plaintiff:
STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Paige v. Bomar Industries International, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv05513
Plaintiff:
Lou Paige, Lou Paige and Lou Paige
Defendant:
Bomar Industries International, Inc. and Kyle G. Boyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
