Cases 1 - 10 of 2,456
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00569
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Century Exploration Ltd Partnership et al v. U S Dept of Interior et al
as 6:2024cv00520
Plaintiff:
Century Exploration Ltd Partnership, Century Exploration New Orleans L L C, Century Exploration Co and others
Defendant:
U S Dept of Interior, Interior Board of Land Appeals, Debra Haaland and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Burdogz LLC et al
as 6:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Burdogz LLC d/b/a Burdogz and d/b/a Burdogz Bar and Grill, Jennifer K. Moya and Russell C. Moya
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
USA v. Llanes-Rubalcava
as 24-50246
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Luis Saul Llanes-Rubalcava, also known as Alexander C. Jason
Calumet Shreveport Refining L L C v Regan
as 5:2024cv00402
Plaintiff:
Calumet Shreveport Refining L L C
Defendant:
Michael S Regan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604 Clear Air Act (Emission Standards)
USA v. Washington
as 24-30174
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ladarrell C. Washington
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Shamrock's Pub Humble, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00894
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Shamrock's Pub Humble, LLC d/b/a Shamrock's Pub and d/b/a Shamrocks Pub & Grill, Brandon C. Santana and Jeremy Santana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Menard et al v. Blanchard et al
as 5:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
G Sid Menard, Jr and American Tile & Marble Co Inc
Defendant:
Jeffrey Paul Blanchard and Blanchard Construction Services L L C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
