Cases 41 - 50 of 2,629
Harel Talasazan v. Robert M. Farrell et al
as 2:2024cv01356
Defendant:
Attorney Poonam Patidar, Robert M. Farrell, Maria R. Hamilton and others
Plaintiff:
Harel Talasazan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00968
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01311
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00470
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Amanda Wilde v. County of Orange et al
as 8:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Amanda Wilde
Defendant:
County of Orange, Orange County Social Services, Child Protective Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00768
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Terrence C. Daniels v. Los Angeles County Superior Court
as 2:2024cv01083
Plaintiff:
Terrence C. Daniels
Defendant:
Los Angeles County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Phelps v. DOE et al
as 4:2024cv00567
Plaintiff:
Briggett C Phelps
Defendant:
Yolanda DOE, CEO of E.A.H. Housing, Angela DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
C. et al v. Town of Atherton et al
as 3:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
K. C. and D. B.
Defendant:
Town of Atherton, David Metzger, Diego Romero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
