Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,756
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01350
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01333
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
BUSSMAN v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv01316
Plaintiff: CHARLES MASON BUSSMAN
Defendant: UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RASIER, LLC and Bruceline C. Fru
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01287
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
HARO v. STARK
as 1:2024cv01294
Plaintiff: ABIGAIL HARO
Defendant: ALAN M. STARK
Cross Defendant: KEVIN B. PIERCY, TAYLOR R. EALAND, JAMES D. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01273
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01230
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01226
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01117
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
NWOSU v. FRIEDRICH et al
as 1:2024cv00987
Plaintiff: ADAEZE NWOSU
Defendant: DABNEY FRIEDRICH and ANA C. REYES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?