Cases 1 - 10 of 129
Mayfield v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
as 1:2023cv00311
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Mayfield
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and SSA Noticing
Interested Party:
US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv00178
Plaintiff:
Michaela C. Miller
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
PEGRAM v. KIJKAZI
as 1:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
BRANDON C PEGRAM and BRANDON C. PEGRAM
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE - SOCIAL SECURITY NOTICING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
O'CONNELL v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2021cv00929
Plaintiff:
JILLIAN C. O'CONNELL
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jones v. Kijakazi
as 7:2021cv00183
Plaintiff:
Joshua C. Jones
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Davis v. Kijakazi
as 5:2021cv00321
Plaintiff:
Tai Everly Davis and c/o Matthew Wilcut
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Anderson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00230
Plaintiff:
Samantha C. Anderson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BOLDEN v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv01138
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH C. BOLDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Alexander v. Saul
as 1:2019cv00253
Plaintiff:
Kelly C. Alexander
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul and Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Henley v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv00242
Plaintiff:
Valerie C. Henley
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
