Cases 1 - 10 of 1,643
DO NOT USE
as 2:2024cv00955
Plaintiff:
Justin Lynn Victory
Defendant:
Bank of America, Bank MGR, C. Larose and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Sashinger v. Logan et al
as 2:2024cv00926
Plaintiff:
Crystal Sashinger
Defendant:
c/o Logan, Warden Reubart, J. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rose v. Northern Division of Parole
as 3:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Douglas C. Rose
Defendant:
Northern Division of Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. SCM Investors, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00905
Plaintiff:
Georgia Thompson
Defendant:
SCM Investors, LLC and A & C Properties, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Gapasin v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2024cv00897
Petitioner:
Richard Gaspin
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons and Warden CoreCivic C. Chestnut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vandenbergen v. Doyle et al
as 2:2024cv00875
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Vandenbergen
Defendant:
Beatriz J. Doyle, Jillian Doppie, Margarate Johansen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. TCP Global Corporation
as 2:2024cv00853
Plaintiff:
Lavell C Robinson
Defendant:
TCP Global Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Diaz v. LVCC Halfway House et al
as 2:2024cv00847
Plaintiff:
Angel Diaz
Defendant:
LVCC Halfway House and C. Chestnut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ho v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Edmund Ho
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, William A. Gittere, David C. Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardeley v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Marque Gardeley
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, William A. Gittere, David C. Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
