Cases 1 - 10 of 15
STEVEN A. CONNER DPM, P.C. v. FOX REHABILITATION SERVICES, P.C.
as 2:2021cv01580
Plaintiff:
STEVEN A. CONNER DPM, P.C.
Defendant:
FOX REHABILITATION SERVICES, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
STEVEN A. CONNER DPM, P.C. v. DRY CAST HOLDINGS LLC
as 2:2018cv00139
Plaintiff:
STEVEN A. CONNER DPM, P.C.
Defendant:
DRY CAST HOLDINGS LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Dougherty et al v. Dupes et al
as 1:2017cv01541
Plaintiff:
Keith Dougherty, Brent Frey, Erica Frey and others
Defendant:
Jared Dupes , Commonwealth Court Clerk, Christopher Conner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEVEN A. CONNER DPM, P.C. v. OPTUM360, LLC
as 2:2017cv01642
Plaintiff:
STEVEN A. CONNER DPM, P.C.
Defendant:
OPTUM360, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
CONNER v. ADVANCED DIABETIC SOLUTIONS, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv01437
Plaintiff:
STEVEN A. CONNER
Defendant:
ADVANCED DIABETIC SOLUTIONS, LLC and JOHN DOES 1 - 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arnold et al v. Chesapeake Energy Corporation et al
as 4:2016cv01345
Plaintiff:
Paul H. Arnold , Theodore R Babcock , Connie R Babcock and others
Defendant:
Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C., Chesapeake Energy Marketing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00986
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01549
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CONNER v. ALLIANCE ONE RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT, INC.
as 2:2015cv04261
Plaintiff:
BEVERLY E. CONNER
Defendant:
ALLIANCE ONE RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
