Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Carey v. Macy's Inc.
as 3:2010cv00530
Plaintiff:
Makiesha M. Carey
Defendant:
Macy's Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
May v. Conrad et al
as 3:2010cv00469
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee May
Defendant:
Karen Conrad, Courtney Baxter, Elizabeth Curtain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
May v. Conrad et al
as 3:2010mc00012
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee May
Defendant:
Karen Conrad, Courtney Baxter, Elizabeth Curtain and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Portman v. Wilson et al
as 5:2010cv00169
Plaintiff:
Carey Portman
Defendant:
Eric Wilson, Stephen Dewalt, Paul Harvey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Adams et al v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 5:2010cv00043
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Jazz Adams, Rodney Grimes, Marcus Carey and others
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, Kentucky Department of Corrections, Samuel Fletcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carey v. SSA
as 5:2009cv00091
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Carey
Defendant:
SSA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Parks v. Williamson et al
as 6:2008cv00403
Petitioner:
Darrell James Parks
Respondent:
Troy Williamson, S Scott, Harris and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Operating Engineers' Local 324 pension Fund Board of Trustees v. Fifth Third Bank et al
as 2:2008cv00226
Plaintiff:
Operating Engineers' Local 324 pension Fund Board of Trustees
Defendant:
Fifth Third Bank, Milestone Realty Services, Inc., Carey Milestone Advisors, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Benefiel et al v. Biomedical Tissue Services, Ltd. et al
as 3:2008cv00529
Plaintiff:
Debra Benefiel, Georgett M. Bishop, Shirley Carey and others
Defendant:
Biomedical Tissue Services, Ltd., Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc., Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
