Cases 1 - 10 of 88
Vining v. Private Contractor, GEO Group et al
as 3:2023cv50201
Plaintiff:
Jerome Vining
Defendant:
Private Contractor, GEO Group, Gonzales, A. Leeper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Ciolli
as 1:2023cv01955
Petitioner:
Joseph Jose Banks
Respondent:
A. Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Vining v. Ciolli, Jr. et al
as 3:2023cv50088
Plaintiff:
Jerome Vining
Defendant:
Andrew Ciolli, Jr. and United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Hunt v. Bergami et al
as 3:2022cv50360
Plaintiff:
Maurice Hunt
Defendant:
Warden Bergami, Warden Gonzales, Warden A. Ciolli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dean v. Ciolli et al
as 3:2022cv50319
Plaintiff:
Todd Glenn Dean
Defendant:
Ciolli, Taylor, Six Unknown Named Agents and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cruz v. Ciolli
as 3:2022cv50151
Petitioner:
Antonio LaShaun Cruz
Respondent:
David Gonzalez and Andrew Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Dean v. Ciolli et al
as 3:2022cv50118
Plaintiff:
Todd G. Dean
Defendant:
Mr. Ciolli, Nurse Administrator, Six Unknown Named Agents Of Fed. Bur. Of Narcotics and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Castro v. Ciolli
as 3:2022cv50079
Petitioner:
Antonio Castro
Respondent:
A. Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Morgan v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 3:2022cv50080
Plaintiff:
Jack William Morgan
Defendant:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons and Warden Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Espinosa v. Ciolli
as 3:2022cv50059
Petitioner:
Christopher Alex Lee Espinosa
Respondent:
Warden Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
