Cases 1 - 10 of 431
Deafueh Monbo, et al v. Upper Chesapeake Medical Center, Inc., et al
as 24-7070
Plaintiff:
Deafueh Monbo and Juahdi Monbo
Defendant:
Upper Chesapeake Medical Center, Inc., Harford Memorial Hospital, Inc., Eskinder Afework, individually and as an employee of Upper Chesapeake Medical Center Inc. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Employees' Retirement Plan Of The National Edu, et al v. Clark County Education Association
as 24-7067
Plaintiff:
Employees' Retirement Plan of the National Education Association and Retirement Board of the Employees' Retirement Plan of the National Education Association of the United States
Defendant:
Clark County Education Association
CLARKE v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 1:2024cv00783
Plaintiff:
GEORGE M. CLARKE, III
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
CLARKE et al v. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
as 1:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
KEVIN CLARKE, TREVOR BOECKMANN, HARRY CRANE and others
Defendant:
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
F. Bauer, et al v. FDIC, et al
as 24-5014
Plaintiff:
F. Scott Bauer and Jeffrey T. Clark
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Southern Community Financial Corporation, Southern Community Financial, LLC and others
F. Bauer, et al v. FDIC, et al
as 24-5015
Plaintiff:
F. Scott Bauer and Jeffrey T. Clark
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Southern Community Financial Corporation, Southern Community Financial, LLC and others
F. Bauer, et al v. FDIC, et al
as 24-5013
Plaintiff:
F. Scott Bauer and Jeffrey T. Clark
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Southern Community Financial Corporation, Southern Community Financial, LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
