Cases 1 - 10 of 491
Clark v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00352
Petitioner:
Eric Clark
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. Collier-TDCJ Executive Director
as 6:2024cv00179
Petitioner:
Reginald Lee Clark
Respondent:
Brian Collier-TDCJ Executive Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clarke v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01305
Petitioner:
James David Clarke, Jr
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ross v. Risperdaul
as 9:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Ryan Clark Ross
Defendant:
Risperdaul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clarke v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01205
Petitioner:
James David Clarke, Jr
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. Hill County Jail
as 4:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Eric James Clark
Defendant:
Hill County Jail, Sandy Lynn Cook, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Lumpkin
as 1:2024cv00118
Petitioner:
Herbert Charles Clark
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. LumpkinCase transferred to Eastern District of Texas - Beaumont Division.
as 3:2024cv00083
Petitioner:
Herbert Charles Clark
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Collier et al
as 3:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Ivery Clark Williams
Defendant:
Bryan Collier and Michael Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv04179
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
